Chillous v. State
Opinion
The appellant, Clyde Chillous, Jr., appeals from the summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. In February 1993, the appellant pleaded guilty to manslaughter and to attempted murder. In November 1993, the appellant filed a post-conviction petition attacking his convictions. The appellant asserted that his guilty pleas were not voluntary. The trial court denied the petition, stating that this issue was precluded because it should have raised at trial or on direct appeal and was not. Rule 32.2(a)(3) and 32.2(a)(5), A.R.Crim.P.
Because of the recent decisions by the Supreme Court of Alabama we must remand this cause so that a hearing can be held on appellant’s allegations that his pleas were not voluntary. In Cantu v. State, [Ms. 1920426, April 15, 1994] — So.2d — (Ala.1994),
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
649 So. 2d 1341 (Chillous v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.