Chillicothe & Brunswick Railroad v. Mayor of Brunswick

44 Mo. 553
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 Mo. 553 (Chillicothe & Brunswick Railroad v. Mayor of Brunswick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chillicothe & Brunswick Railroad v. Mayor of Brunswick, 44 Mo. 553 (Mo. 1869).

Opinion

Bliss, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The city of Brunswick, under authority of plaintiff’s charter (Adj. Sess. Acts 1863, p. 485), issued to the plaintiff its bonds to the amount of $25,000, and received certificates of stock therefor. The company negotiated the bonds, and upon the [554]*554interest coupons falling due, the city authorities refused to provide for their payment. To save the credit of the bonds and of the company, the company provides temporarily for the payment of the coupons, and asks for a writ of mandamus upon the defendants, commanding them to make provision for the payment of said coupons, and also for those falling due. An alternative writ was issued, returnable the 8th of November of this term, which was duly served, but defendants make no reply.

The default of defendants admits the facts, and the only questions that affect the legality of the subscription and bonds were decided in State ex rel. Mo. & Miss. R.R. Co. v. Macon County Court, 41 Mo. 458.

A peremptory writ will issue.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicolay v. St. Clair County
18 F. Cas. 227 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Mo. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chillicothe-brunswick-railroad-v-mayor-of-brunswick-mo-1869.