Childs v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Childs v. State

74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 829, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 713

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 19, 1912

Docket4013

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 74 S.E. 89 (Childs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Childs v. State, 74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 829, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 713 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. In eases of alleged arson, in the absence of evidence as to the cause of the burning, the law presumes that the fire was accidental, and the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the perpetration of the criminal act. Ragland v. State, 2 Ga. App. 492 (58 S. E. 689) ; West v. State, 6 Ga. App. 105 (64 S. E. 130).

2. It is well settled that the corpus delicti must be shown by evidence aliunde the confession or incriminatory admissions. West v. State, supra; Boyd v. State, 4 Ga. App. 58; Allen v. State, 4 Ga. App. 458 (61 S. E. 740) ; Bines v. State, 118 Ga. 320 (45 S. E. 376, 68 L. R. A. 33). [830]*830In the present ease there was no evidence whatever tending to prove the arson, except admissions slightly incriminatory, and these admissions were inconclusive, and at most raised only a bare suspicion of guilt. The verdict was therefore without any evidence to support it, and was contrary to law. Judgment reversed.

Decided March 19, 1912.

Indictment for arson; from Henry superior court — Judge R. T. Daniel.

January 12, 1912. Brown & Brown, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Wise, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. In eases of alleged arson, in the absence of evidence as to the cause of the burning, the law presumes that the fire was accidental, and the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the perpetration of the criminal act. Ragland v. State, 2 Ga. App. 492 (58 S. E. 689) ; West v. State, 6 Ga. App. 105 (64 S. E. 130).

2. It is well settled that the corpus delicti must be shown by evidence aliunde the confession or incriminatory admissions. West v. State, supra; Boyd v. State, 4 Ga. App. 58; Allen v. State, 4 Ga. App. 458 (61 S. E. 740) ; Bines v. State, 118 Ga. 320 (45 S. E. 376, 68 L. R. A. 33). [830]*830In the present ease there was no evidence whatever tending to prove the arson, except admissions slightly incriminatory, and these admissions were inconclusive, and at most raised only a bare suspicion of guilt. The verdict was therefore without any evidence to support it, and was contrary to law. Judgment reversed.

Decided March 19, 1912.

Indictment for arson; from Henry superior court — Judge R. T. Daniel.

January 12, 1912. Brown & Brown, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Wise, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 829, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/childs-v-state-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack