Boyd v. State

61 S.E. 134, 4 Ga. App. 273, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 267
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 22, 1908·No. 1037·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. Where an indictment for burglary alleges, as the purpose of the breaking, the intent to commit a larceny, no description, value, or ownership of any goods intended to be stolen need be alleged. Tarver v. State, 95 Ga. 223 (21 S. E. 381) ; Kidd v. State, 101 Ga. 528 (28 S. E. 990) ; Lanier v. State, 76 Ga. 304; Berry v. State, 124 Ga. 825 (53 S. E. 616).

2. Where one person rents a house and uses it as a dwelling, but allows a room therein to be occupied by a boarder or lodger, and this room is burglarized, the ownership of the house, in an indictment for burglary, may be alleged either in the general or in the special occupant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyd v. State, 61 S.E. 134, 4 Ga. App. 273, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

61 S.E. 134 (Boyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexander v. State
228 S.E.2d 364 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Green v. State
213 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Bacon v. State
70 S.E.2d 54 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Harris v. State
167 S.E. 609 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Farm v. State
100 S.E. 36 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)