Chiesa v. Fetchko
This text of 475 A.2d 740 (Chiesa v. Fetchko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The parties in the instant appeal frame the issues as being whether Section 602 of the Health Care Services Malpractice Act (Act), Act of October 15, 1975, P.L. 390, as amended, 40 P.S. § 1301.602 (Supp.1983-84), applies to medical malpractice cases settled within the exclusive jurisdiction of the common pleas courts. We need not address this issue, however, inasmuch as the arbitration process in the area of medical malpractice has been declared unconstitutional. Heller v. Frankston, 504 Pa. 528, 475 A.2d 1291 (1984); Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980). The statutory section in question, entitled “Reduc[505]*505tion of award by other benefits,” is no longer viable. Heller v. Frankston, supra; Mattos v. Thompson, supra.
Accordingly, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 A.2d 740, 504 Pa. 503, 1984 Pa. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiesa-v-fetchko-pa-1984.