Chiesa v. Fetchko

475 A.2d 740, 504 Pa. 503, 1984 Pa. LEXIS 262
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 25, 1984·No. Appeal 77 W.D. Appeal Docket 1983·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The parties in the instant appeal frame the issues as being whether Section 602 of the Health Care Services Malpractice Act (Act), Act of October 15, 1975, P.L. 390, as amended, 40 P.S. § 1301.602 (Supp.1983-84), applies to medical malpractice cases settled within the exclusive jurisdiction of the common pleas courts. We need not address this issue, however, inasmuch as the arbitration process in the area of medical malpractice has been declared unconstitutional. Heller v. Frankston, 504 Pa. 528, 475 A.2d 1291 (1984); Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980). The statutory section in question, entitled “Reduc[505]*505tion of award by other benefits,” is no longer viable. Heller v. Frankston, supra; Mattos v. Thompson, supra.

Accordingly, the Order of the Superior Court is hereby affirmed.

HUTCHINSON, J., filed a dissenting opinion. PAPADAKOS, J., did not participate in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chiesa v. Fetchko, 475 A.2d 740, 504 Pa. 503, 1984 Pa. LEXIS 262 (Pa. 1984).

475 A.2d 740 (Chiesa v. Fetchko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coldwell Banker Manning Realty, Inc. v. Cushman & Wakefield
980 A.2d 819 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2009)
Miller v. Lankenau Hospital
618 A.2d 1197 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Pennsylvania Ass'n of Rural & Small Schools v. Casey
613 A.2d 1198 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Viadock v. Nesbitt Memorial Hospital
489 A.2d 240 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Chiesa v. Fetchko
475 A.2d 740 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)