Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Brotherhood Labor Leasing

141 F.3d 1167, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974, 1998 WL 121398
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 1998
Docket97-3169
StatusUnpublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 141 F.3d 1167 (Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Brotherhood Labor Leasing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Brotherhood Labor Leasing, 141 F.3d 1167, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974, 1998 WL 121398 (8th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

141 F.3d 1167

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
CHICAGO TRUCK DRIVERS, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union
Pension Fund, a pension trust; George Ossey; Tony
Cullotta; John Broderick; William H.
Carpenter, the present
trustees, Appellees,
v.
BROTHERHOOD LABOR LEASING, a Missouri corporation; MFI
Leasing Company, a Missouri corporation; Falls City
Industries, Inc., a Kentucky corporation; Middlewest
Freightways, Inc., a Missouri corporation, Appellants.

No. 97-3169.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 9, 1998.
Filed March 18, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before BOWMAN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and MONTGOMERY, District Judge.1

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal the summary judgment entered against them by the District Court2 awarding plaintiffs interim payments of withdrawal liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1980. The judgment is based on the court's determination that defendants were under common control with Be-Mac Transport, Inc. on the date of Be-Mac's complete withdrawal from the Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Pension Fund.

Having considered the briefs, the record, and the arguments of the parties, we conclude that the judgment of the District Court is correct. No error of law appears, and an opinion would add nothing of substance to the thorough and well-written opinions of the District Court. Accordingly, we forego extended discussion.

1

The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation

2

The Honorable David D. Noce, United States Magistriate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, acting pursuant to the consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 F.3d 1167, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 13974, 1998 WL 121398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-truck-drivers-helpers-warehouse-workers-union-pension-fund-v-ca8-1998.