Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. McGill
This text of 1917 OK 43 (Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. McGill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause is identical in all essential features with the case of Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co., a corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. F. F. McGill, Defendant in Error (No. 6824) 63 Okla. 64, 162 Pac. 705, wherein a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, upon the ground that the ninth subdivision of section 5033, Rev. Laws 1910, was not applicable to proceedings pending at the time <oi the adoption of the Harris-Day Code, has just been sustained.
There is also a motion to dismiss this proceeding in error upon the same ground, which must be sustained for the reasons stated in the former opinion. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1917 OK 43, 162 P. 706, 63 Okla. 65, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-r-i-p-r-co-v-mcgill-okla-1917.