Chicago Portrait Co. v. O'Neal
65 S.E. 161, 6 Ga. App. 425, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 329
Opinion
The admissions of a principal are prima facie evidence against his sureties, if made pending the relationship and concerning the transaction as to which the suretyship exists. Stephens v. Crawford, 1 Ga. 574 (44 Am. D. 680); Dobbs v. Justices, 17 Ga. 625; 2 Wigmore on Evidence, §1077; 1 Enc. Ev. 586, 587; 27 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (2d ed.), 456. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chicago Portrait Co. v. O'Neal, 65 S.E. 161, 6 Ga. App. 425, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 329 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
65 S.E. 161 (Chicago Portrait Co. v. O'Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Guarantee Co. v. Colonial Oil Co.
145 F.2d 496 (Fifth Circuit, 1944)
American Surety Co. v. Smith
191 S.E. 137 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Atlanta Journal Co. v. Knowles
102 S.E. 191 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
William Hester Marble Co. v. Walton
96 S.E. 269 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)