Chicago Portrait Co. v. O'Neal
65 S.E. 161, 6 Ga. App. 425, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 329
This text of 65 S.E. 161 (Chicago Portrait Co. v. O'Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chicago Portrait Co. v. O'Neal, 65 S.E. 161, 6 Ga. App. 425, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 329 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
Opinion
The admissions of a principal are prima facie evidence against his sureties, if made pending the relationship and concerning the transaction as to which the suretyship exists. Stephens v. Crawford, 1 Ga. 574 (44 Am. D. 680); Dobbs v. Justices, 17 Ga. 625; 2 Wigmore on Evidence, §1077; 1 Enc. Ev. 586, 587; 27 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (2d ed.), 456. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States Guarantee Co. v. Colonial Oil Co.
145 F.2d 496 (Fifth Circuit, 1944)
American Surety Co. v. Smith
191 S.E. 137 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Atlanta Journal Co. v. Knowles
102 S.E. 191 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
William Hester Marble Co. v. Walton
96 S.E. 269 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
65 S.E. 161, 6 Ga. App. 425, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-portrait-co-v-oneal-gactapp-1909.