Chicago Nut Co. v. Commissioner

5 B.T.A. 614, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2827
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided November 24, 1926·No. Docket No. 19180.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION.

MoRRis:

The petitioner contends that its net income for 1922, after making due allowance for net loss in the year 1921 and applying [615] the provisions of section 204 of the Revenue Act of 1921, is less than $25,000, and that it is thereby entitled to the $2,000 credit. That question has already been decided adversely to the petitioner in the Appeals of American Varnish Co., 2 B. T. A. 201, and S. W. Bridges & Co., 4 B. T. A. 750, and upon the authority of those appeals the determination of the Commissioner is approved.

The deficiency for 1922 is $815.80. Order will he entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chicago Nut Co. v. Commissioner, 5 B.T.A. 614, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2827 (bta 1926).

5 B.T.A. 614 (Chicago Nut Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chicago Nut Co. v. Commissioner
5 B.T.A. 614 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)