Chicago, Milwaukee, & St. Paul Railroad v. Ackley

94 U.S. 179, 24 L. Ed. 99, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1845
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 18, 1877
Docket352
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 94 U.S. 179 (Chicago, Milwaukee, & St. Paul Railroad v. Ackley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago, Milwaukee, & St. Paul Railroad v. Ackley, 94 U.S. 179, 24 L. Ed. 99, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1845 (1877).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question presented by this record is whether a railroad company in Wisconsin can recover for the transportation of property more than the maximum fixed by the act of March 11, 1874, by showing that the amount charged was no more than a reasonable compensation for the services rendered.

What we have already said in Peik v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company, and Lawrence v. Same, supra, p. 164, is applicable to this case. As between the company and a freighter, there is a statutory limitation of the charge for transportation actually performed. If the company should refuse to carry at the prices fixed, and an attempt should be made to forfeit its charter on that account, other questions might arise, which it will be time enough to consider when they are presented. But for goods actually carried, the limit of the recovery is that prescribed by the statute. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Field and Mr. Justice Stbong dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laird v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
88 A. 347 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1913)
State ex rel. Taylor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
92 P. 606 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1907)
Perkins v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
155 F. 445 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, 1907)
Attorney General v. Old Colony Railroad
35 N.E. 252 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Budd v. New York
143 U.S. 517 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Bullard v. Northern Pacific Railroad
10 Mont. 168 (Montana Supreme Court, 1890)
Spring Valley Water Works v. City & County of San Francisco
22 P. 910 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Pensacola & Atlantic Railroad v. State
25 Fla. 310 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1889)
Dow v. Beidelman
125 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Hockett v. State
5 N.E. 178 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 U.S. 179, 24 L. Ed. 99, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-railroad-v-ackley-scotus-1877.