Chicago & Erie R. R. v. Ebersole
226 U.S. 601, 33 S. Ct. 114, 57 L. Ed. 376, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2170
This text of 226 U.S. 601 (Chicago & Erie R. R. v. Ebersole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chicago & Erie R. R. v. Ebersole, 226 U.S. 601, 33 S. Ct. 114, 57 L. Ed. 376, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2170 (1912).
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389, 393; Missouri Pacific Ry. v. Fitzgerald, 160 U. S. 556, 576; Chappell Chemical & Fertilizer Co. v. Sulphur Mines Co., 172 U. S. 471.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
California Powder Works v. Davis
151 U.S. 389 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Fitzgerald
160 U.S. 556 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Chappell Chemical & Fertilizer Co. v. Sulphur Mines Co.
172 U.S. 465 (Supreme Court, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
226 U.S. 601, 33 S. Ct. 114, 57 L. Ed. 376, 1912 U.S. LEXIS 2170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-erie-r-r-v-ebersole-scotus-1912.