Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Saunders

85 Ill. 288
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 85 Ill. 288 (Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Saunders, 85 Ill. 288 (Ill. 1877).

Opinion

Per Cubiam:

The evidence does not show negligence by the defendant’s servants in running and operating its train, whereby the plaintiff’s horses were killed. From the evidence, they seem to have done all that could have been done, after the peril of the horses was discovered, to have reasonably avoided injuring them.

The horses got upon the track through an opening made in the fence by persons in the employ of the Springfield and Northwestern Railroad Company. This occurred late in the evening of Saturday, the 22d of November, 1874, and the horses were killed by a freight train passing north, about 12 o’clock the same night. There is no evidence that any employee of the defendant was aware of the breach in the fence; and we do not think the circumstances proved are such as authorized them to anticipate the breach being made at that time. On the principle announced in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Swearingen, 47 Ill. 206, there was no right to recover.

The covenant in the deed does not add to the defendant’s liability under the statute, and does not affect the principle.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad
184 Ill. App. 80 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1913)
West Chicago St. R. R. Co. v. Klecka
94 Ill. App. 346 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Dugan
48 N.E. 238 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1898)
Chicago & Alton R. R. v. Patterson & Johnson
72 Ill. App. 428 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. Harris
33 Fla. 217 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1894)
Railroad Co. v. Schultz
43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 270 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 Ill. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-alton-railroad-v-saunders-ill-1877.