Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine Corp.

3 F.3d 123, 1993 WL 358507
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 16, 1993·No. 91-3766·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and JUSTICE * , District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 35) the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. Petitioner and amici read our opinion too broadly. We simply hold that the surveillance evidence should have been disclosed during discovery because it was not used solely for impeachment as the local rule requires. The impeaching value of the evidence was minimal, whereas the evidence was probative on a central substantive issue in the case — plaintiffs physical condition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine Corp., 3 F.3d 123, 1993 WL 358507 (5th Cir. 1993).

3 F.3d 123 (Chiasson v. Zapata Gulf Marine Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Pugh
945 F.3d 9 (Second Circuit, 2019)
Marchello v. Chase Manhattan Auto Finance Corp.
219 F.R.D. 217 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Pro Billiards Tour Ass'n v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
187 F.R.D. 229 (M.D. North Carolina, 1999)
Wegner v. Cliff Viessman, Inc.
153 F.R.D. 154 (N.D. Iowa, 1994)