Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CHET’S SHOES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SIDNEY KASTNER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________

2010-1555 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Vermont in No. 08-CV-0197, Senior Judge J. Garvan Murtha. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DONALD W. NILES, Niles Law Office, P.A., of Wadena, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee.

WALTER D. AMES, Law Office of Walter D. Ames, of McLean, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellant. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 5, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk