Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner

408 F. App'x 360
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner. Read the opinion of the Court — 449 F. App'x 37
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided February 2, 2011·No. 2010-1555·Unpublished

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

Sidney Kastner moves to remand this case to the United States District Court for the District of Vermont with instructions that the district court “identify fully specific ‘prior art’ on which its decision granting summary judgment of non-infringement to Chet’s Shoes, Inc. is based.” Chet’s Shoes, Inc. opposes.

This court denies the motion without prejudice to the parties raising the issues in their briefs, if appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is denied without prejudice.

(2) Sydney Kastner’s brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner, 408 F. App'x 360 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

408 F. App'x 360 (Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.