Cheshire v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Cheshire v. State

64 So. 544, 10 Ala. App. 139, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 152

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 3, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 64 So. 544 (Cheshire v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cheshire v. State, 64 So. 544, 10 Ala. App. 139, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 152 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

WALKER, P. J.

Of several rulings which the record presents for review, it is not deemed necessary to say more than that obviously in none of them was there any error.

Written charge 5 requested by the defendant was properly refused, as, for the state to sustain the charge made by the indictment, it was not required to prove that the defendant in the manner' alleged obtained the exact amount of money mentioned in the indictment; the averment of amount not being of an essential ingredient of the offense charged. — Hope v. State, 5 Ala. App. 123, 59 South. 326; Davis v. State, 3 Ala. App. 71, 57 South. 493.

As there was evidence tending to prove the charge made in the indictment, written charge 1 requested by the defendant was properly refused.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI