Cherry Petersen Landry Albert LLP v. Erwin Cruz, M.D.
Opinion
Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas MANDATE
TO THE 101ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, GREETINGS:
Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 26th day of August, 2014, the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between
CHERRY PETERSEN LANDRY On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District ALBERT LLP, Appellant Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-16274. No. 05-12-01559-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers, Justices Francis and Lewis participating. ERWIN CRUZ, M.D., Appellee
was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s November 1, 2012 sanctions order is VACATED and judgment is RENDERED that Erwin Cruz, M.D. take nothing by his motion for sanctions.
It is ORDERED that appellant Cherry Petersen Landry Albert LLP recover its costs of this appeal from appellee Erwin Cruz, M.D. The obligations of Travelers Insurance as surety on appellant’s supersedeas bond are DISCHARGED.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed. WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 28th day of October, 2015.
LISA MATZ, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cherry Petersen Landry Albert LLP v. Erwin Cruz, M.D. (Cherry Petersen Landry Albert LLP v. Erwin Cruz, M.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.