Cherry Petersen Landry Albert LLP v. Erwin Cruz, M.D.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cherry Petersen Landry Albert LLP v. Erwin Cruz, M.D.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 9510 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 4, 2013·No. 05-12-01559-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered February 4, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01559-CV

CHERRY PETERSEN LANDRY ALBERT LLP, Appellant

ERWIN CRUZ, M.D., Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-16274

ORDER The Court has before it the parties’ January 30, 2013 unopposed joint motion to align

briefing schedules. The Court DENIES the motion. Appellant’s brief is due on March 8, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered February 4, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01559-CV

CHERRY PETERSEN LANDRY ALBERT LLP, Appellant

ERWIN CRUZ, M.D., Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-16274

ORDER The Court has before it the parties’ January 30, 2013 unopposed joint motion to align

briefing schedules. The Court DENIES the motion. Appellant’s brief is due on March 8, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Cherry Petersen Landry Albert LLP v. Erwin Cruz, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Cherry Petersen Landry Albert LLP v. Erwin Cruz, M.D. (Cherry Petersen Landry Albert LLP v. Erwin Cruz, M.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.