Chernetsky v. Del Papa
This text of 139 F. App'x 811 (Chernetsky v. Del Papa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Anthony Chernetsky appeals the district court’s denial of his § 2254 habeas petition [812]*812challenging his Nevada murder conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The sole issue contained in the COA is whether appellant was entitled to a stay to exhaust his claim as he requested. We reverse and remand for reconsideration of the stay request in light of Rhines v. Weber, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1528, 161 L.Ed.2d 440 (2005). See Cassett v. Stewart, 406 F.3d 614, 625 (9th Cir.2005).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chernetsky-v-del-papa-ca9-2005.