Chene v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Chene v. City of Detroit

248 N.W. 884, 263 Mich. 512, 1933 Mich. LEXIS 1184

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 2, 1933

DocketDocket No. 128, Calendar No. 36,990.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 248 N.W. 884 (Chene v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chene v. City of Detroit, 248 N.W. 884, 263 Mich. 512, 1933 Mich. LEXIS 1184 (Mich. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Sharpe, J.

The trial court in the opinion filed in this case, and which we adopted (262 Mich. 253), found (1) that there had been a common-law dedication of the highway in question, and (2) that it had become a highway by user. In the application for rehearing counsel stressed a claim that the court had based its finding, in part, upon a statement made by him that: “During the years 1925 to 1929 the city of Royal Oak performed work on the street.” Strictly speaking, there was no evidence to support this statement, but the record discloses, as stated by the trial court, that when the Huntington Woods subdivision was platted it ‘ ‘ gave a bond to the township conditioned that it would improve the streets, ’ ’ and that it did so.

This plat was recorded on February 5, 1917. Huntington road is shown thereon to be 30 feet in width. The then owner of the adjoining land, after-wards acquired by the Zoological Society, in pursuance of an agreement with the platter, had built a permanent wire fence 30 feet from the line of the platted street in 1916, and this 60-foot strip of land *514 was treated by the adjoining owners and the public as a highway, and, although not improved much until later, was, to some extent at least, used for that purpose thereafter, and became a highway by user. 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 3936.

The decree entered by the trial court is again affirmed, with costs to appellees.

McDonald, C. J., and Clark, Potter, North, Fead, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Rehearing.

Sharpe, J.

The trial court in the opinion filed in this case, and which we adopted (262 Mich. 253), found (1) that there had been a common-law dedication of the highway in question, and (2) that it had become a highway by user. In the application for rehearing counsel stressed a claim that the court had based its finding, in part, upon a statement made by him that: “During the years 1925 to 1929 the city of Royal Oak performed work on the street.” Strictly speaking, there was no evidence to support this statement, but the record discloses, as stated by the trial court, that when the Huntington Woods subdivision was platted it ‘ ‘ gave a bond to the township conditioned that it would improve the streets, ’ ’ and that it did so.

This plat was recorded on February 5, 1917. Huntington road is shown thereon to be 30 feet in width. The then owner of the adjoining land, after-wards acquired by the Zoological Society, in pursuance of an agreement with the platter, had built a permanent wire fence 30 feet from the line of the platted street in 1916, and this 60-foot strip of land *514 was treated by the adjoining owners and the public as a highway, and, although not improved much until later, was, to some extent at least, used for that purpose thereafter, and became a highway by user. 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 3936.

The decree entered by the trial court is again affirmed, with costs to appellees.

McDonald, C. J., and Clark, Potter, North, Fead, Wiest, and Butzel, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 N.W. 884, 263 Mich. 512, 1933 Mich. LEXIS 1184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chene-v-city-of-detroit-mich-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack