Chemical Engineering Services, Inc. v. Tomlinson
This text of 750 S.W.2d 375 (Chemical Engineering Services, Inc. v. Tomlinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
In the trial court, Appellee John R. Tom-linson, as Plaintiff, sued Appellant Chemical Engineering Services, Inc. d/b/a Dril-pac Management, for money allegedly owed by Drilpac to Tomlinson pursuant to an assignment of a mineral lease from Tomlinson to Drilpac and an operating agreement to which Tomlinson and Drilpac were parties. In a contested preliminary hearing to the court, the court appointed Tomlinson as receiver, and Drilpac has perfected appeal to this court. Appellant has filed a brief, but Appellee has not.
TEX.CIVPRAC. & REM.CODE ANN sec. 64.021 (Vernon 1986) provides in part:
“(a) To be appointed as a receiver for property that is located entirely or partly in this state, a person must:
* * * * * ♦
“(2) not be a party, attorney, or other person interested in the action for appointment of a receiver.”
It is obvious that this statute disqualifies Appellee from being appointed receiver. Appellant’s sole point of error is sustained. The order of the trial court is reversed and vacated.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
750 S.W.2d 375, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 1313, 1988 WL 57451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chemical-engineering-services-inc-v-tomlinson-texapp-1988.