Chemetron Corp. v. Jones

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 1995
Docket94-3371
StatusUnknown

This text of Chemetron Corp. v. Jones (Chemetron Corp. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chemetron Corp. v. Jones, (3d Cir. 1995).

Opinion

Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

12-18-1995

Chemetron Corp. v. Jones Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 94-3371

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

Recommended Citation "Chemetron Corp. v. Jones" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 311. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/311

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 94-3371

CHEMETRON CORPORATION

v.

PHYLLIS JASKEY JONES; PAMELA JO SWANSINGER; SANDRA JASKEY HUJARSKI; PATRICIA HUJARSKI; TERESA HUJARSKI ROSS; JANICE JASKEY BUTVIN; FRANK BUTVIN; ROBERT BUTVIN; BRIAN BUTVIN; SUSAN BUTVIN; WALTER ANIELSKI; ARLENE VANS; YVONNE VANS BEKOSCKE; ANTHONY VANS; GREGORY VANS; CAROL SCHULTZ; MARY SHAFFER; BRITTANY CULL; STEPHANIE SCHAFFER,

Appellants.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 93-cv-01582)

BEFORE: SCIRICA, ROTH and SAROKIN, Circuit Judges

Argued on February 3, 1995

O R D E R

IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case,

filed on December 18, 1995, be amended as follows:

On page 15, line 16, delete the word "known" and replace it with the word "unknown". The full sentence should now read: For these reasons, we will affirm the district court's rulings that claimants were unknown creditors and that Chemetron's publication notice was sufficient.

/s/ Jane R. Roth Circuit Judge

Dated: December 21, 1995

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chemetron Corp. v. Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chemetron-corp-v-jones-ca3-1995.