Chekiang Co. v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 384, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1778
United States Customs Court·Decided January 26, 1954·No. No. 57797; protests 163967-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question consist of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays in chief value of brass, the same in all material respects as those involved in Ignaz Strauss [385]*385& Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chekiang Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 384, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1778 (cusc 1954).
32 Cust. Ct. 384 (Chekiang Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 342 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)
Fan Co. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 42 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 280 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)