Chekiang Co. v. United States
31 Cust. Ct. 310, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1176
United States Customs Court·Decided November 24, 1953·No. No. 57649; protests 174734-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays, composed in chief value of brass, the same in all material respects as those involved in Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), The Fan Co. v. United States (25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chekiang Co. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 310, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1176 (cusc 1953).
31 Cust. Ct. 310 (Chekiang Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 342 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)
Fan Co. v. United States
25 Cust. Ct. 42 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)
Ignaz Strauss & Co. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 280 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)