Cheetham v. Lewis
2 Johns. 104
Opinion
The serving of a notice of a judge’s order is not sufficient; a copy of the order, at least, ought' to have been served.. But as there appears to have been a misapprehension about the practice in this case, the defendant may taire his rule, on payment of costs ; with liberty to the plaintiff to change the venue if he think’ proper ; and if the venue be changed to the city and county of New York, that then the defendant take short notice of trial, which is four days.
Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cheetham v. Lewis, 2 Johns. 104 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).
2 Johns. 104 (Cheetham v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Fisher
24 N.Y. Crim. 171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Umphrey v. Emery
80 N.W. 14 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Mauran v. Hawley
2 Dem. Sur. 396 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1884)
Bank of Utica v. Kibby
7 Cow. 148 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)