Cheetham v. Lewis

2 Johns. 104
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1806
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2 Johns. 104 (Cheetham v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheetham v. Lewis, 2 Johns. 104 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The serving of a notice of a judge’s order is not sufficient; a copy of the order, at least, ought' to have been served.. But as there appears to have been a misapprehension about the practice in this case, the defendant may taire his rule, on payment of costs ; with liberty to the plaintiff to change the venue if he think’ proper ; and if the venue be changed to the city and county of New York, that then the defendant take short notice of trial, which is four days.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Fisher
24 N.Y. Crim. 171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Umphrey v. Emery
80 N.W. 14 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Mauran v. Hawley
2 Dem. Sur. 396 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1884)
Bank of Utica v. Kibby
7 Cow. 148 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheetham-v-lewis-nysupct-1806.