Bank of Utica v. Kibby

7 Cow. 148
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1827·Published

Opinion

Curia.

Shoeing an original order. is necessary, only, where it.is intended to bring a..party into, contempt.for disobeying it. Howland v. Ralph, 3 John. 20. In other cases a copy is sufficient. Cheetham v. Lewis, 2 John. 104. The motion: to set aside the inquest must be granted with, costs..

Motion granted;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of Utica v. Kibby, 7 Cow. 148 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

7 Cow. 148 (Bank of Utica v. Kibby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cheetham v. Lewis
2 Johns. 104 (New York Supreme Court, 1806)
Howland v. Ralph
3 Johns. 20 (New York Supreme Court, 1808)