Bank of Utica v. Kibby

7 Cow. 148
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1827
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Cow. 148 (Bank of Utica v. Kibby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bank of Utica v. Kibby, 7 Cow. 148 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Opinion

Curia.

Shoeing an original order. is necessary, only, where it.is intended to bring a..party into, contempt.for disobeying it. Howland v. Ralph, 3 John. 20. In other cases a copy is sufficient. Cheetham v. Lewis, 2 John. 104. The motion: to set aside the inquest must be granted with, costs..

Motion granted;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cheetham v. Lewis
2 Johns. 104 (New York Supreme Court, 1806)
Howland v. Ralph
3 Johns. 20 (New York Supreme Court, 1808)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Cow. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-utica-v-kibby-nysupct-1827.