Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins

259 A.D. 888, 18 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7182

Opinion

Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision on the prior motion. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ. The motion is granted to the extent of amending the decision of this court handed down February 5, 1940 [258 App. Div. 1054], to read as follows: Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See 258 App. Div. 968.] The following question of law is certified as one which in our opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: Should the motion to vacate the execution issued against the person of the defendant have been granted? Order dated February 5, 1940, resettled accordingly. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins, 259 A.D. 888, 18 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 888 (Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.