Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins

258 A.D. 968, 17 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8475

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 968 (Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins, 258 A.D. 968, 17 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for conversion. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Appellate Term, modifying: an order of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, by vacating an execution issued against the person of the defendant. Order of' the Appellate Term, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No, opinion. Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J.„ dissents and, on the authority of Broome County F. F. R. Assn. v. N. Y. State E.. & G. Corp. (239 App. Div. 304; affd., without opinion, 264 N. Y. 614), votes to, modify the order by striking therefrom the provision vacating the execution against, the person of the defendant and by providing therein that the motion to vacate: the body execution be denied, and, as thus modified, to affirm the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for conversion. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Appellate Term, modifying: an order of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, by vacating an execution issued against the person of the defendant. Order of' the Appellate Term, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No, opinion. Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J.„ dissents and, on the authority of Broome County F. F. R. Assn. v. N. Y. State E.. & G. Corp. (239 App. Div. 304; affd., without opinion, 264 N. Y. 614), votes to, modify the order by striking therefrom the provision vacating the execution against, the person of the defendant and by providing therein that the motion to vacate: the body execution be denied, and, as thus modified, to affirm the order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 968, 17 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chase-watch-corp-v-heins-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack