Chartered New England Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Defendants-Third-Party v. Milton Bombach, Third-Party
This text of 478 F.2d 701 (Chartered New England Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Defendants-Third-Party v. Milton Bombach, Third-Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this suit on a broker’s employees blanket fidelity bond, we are asked to review a summary judgment for the defendant. The question is whether the *702 insured’s negotiations with and entry into agreements with the employee and third person debtors regarding the loss were of such import as to relieve the insurer of liability on the bond, and, more particularly, whether there is a genuine issue as to any material fact which requires reversal.
Having studied the briefs, considered extended oral argument,_ reviewed the record, and conducted substantial independent legal research, the Court is of the opinion that there is no error in the trial court proceedings or in the trial judge’s disposition of the case.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 F.2d 701, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chartered-new-england-corporation-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-company-ca3-1973.