Charlton v. Scoville
39 N.E. 394, 144 N.Y. 691, 1895 N.Y. LEXIS 596
Opinion
reads for affirmance.
All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charlton v. Scoville, 39 N.E. 394, 144 N.Y. 691, 1895 N.Y. LEXIS 596 (N.Y. 1895).
39 N.E. 394 (Charlton v. Scoville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oden Const. Co. v. HELTON
65 So. 2d 442 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1953)
Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
296 F. 298 (Sixth Circuit, 1924)
Midtown Contracting Co. v. Goldsticker
165 A.D. 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. Butler
133 P. 280 (California Supreme Court, 1913)
Shriner v. Craft
51 So. 884 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)
Lazelle v. Empire State Surety Co.
109 P. 195 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
White v. Mitchell
65 N.E. 1061 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1903)
Arndt v. Keller
71 N.W. 651 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1897)