Charles S. Sullivan and Camp Hill Lumber Company, Inc. v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor

Fifth Circuit

Charles S. Sullivan and Camp Hill Lumber Company, Inc. v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor

359 F.2d 426

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 11, 1966

Docket21905

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 359 F.2d 426 (Charles S. Sullivan and Camp Hill Lumber Company, Inc. v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles S. Sullivan and Camp Hill Lumber Company, Inc. v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, 359 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant here makes a direct appeal that this court reverse its recent decision in Wirtz v. Jones, et al., 5 Cir., 340 F.2d 901, in which we held that the Vllth Amendment does not confer a right to a jury trial in an action filed by the Secretary of Labor under Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act for the restraint of a withholding of wage underpayments found by the court to be due employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

There having intervened no new statute law, nor any Supreme Court decision, this court declines to depart from the principle of stare decisis and consider reaching a different result.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant here makes a direct appeal that this court reverse its recent decision in Wirtz v. Jones, et al., 5 Cir., 340 F.2d 901, in which we held that the Vllth Amendment does not confer a right to a jury trial in an action filed by the Secretary of Labor under Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act for the restraint of a withholding of wage underpayments found by the court to be due employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

There having intervened no new statute law, nor any Supreme Court decision, this court declines to depart from the principle of stare decisis and consider reaching a different result.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 F.2d 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-s-sullivan-and-camp-hill-lumber-company-inc-v-w-willard-wirtz-ca5-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack