Charles Henry Ball, Jr. v. District of Columbia

22 F.3d 1184, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 102, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19379, 1994 WL 179975
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 3, 1994·No. 92-7235·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

22 F.3d 1184

306 U.S.App.D.C. 102

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Charles Henry BALL, Jr., et al.
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant.

No. 92-7235.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 3, 1994.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand the case, it is

ORDERED that the joint motion be granted.

The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith a certified copy of this order to the district court in lieu of formal mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Henry Ball, Jr. v. District of Columbia, 22 F.3d 1184, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 102, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19379, 1994 WL 179975 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

22 F.3d 1184 (Charles Henry Ball, Jr. v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowers v. City of High Point
451 S.E.2d 284 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1994)