Charles Henry Ball, Jr. v. District of Columbia
This text of 22 F.3d 1184 (Charles Henry Ball, Jr. v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
22 F.3d 1184
306 U.S.App.D.C. 102
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Charles Henry BALL, Jr., et al.
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant.
No. 92-7235.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 3, 1994.
Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand the case, it is
ORDERED that the joint motion be granted.
The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith a certified copy of this order to the district court in lieu of formal mandate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F.3d 1184, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 102, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19379, 1994 WL 179975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-henry-ball-jr-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1994.