Charles Henry Ball, Jr. v. District of Columbia

22 F.3d 1184, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 102, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19379, 1994 WL 179975
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 3, 1994
Docket92-7235
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 F.3d 1184 (Charles Henry Ball, Jr. v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Henry Ball, Jr. v. District of Columbia, 22 F.3d 1184, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 102, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19379, 1994 WL 179975 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

Opinion

22 F.3d 1184

306 U.S.App.D.C. 102

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Charles Henry BALL, Jr., et al.
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant.

No. 92-7235.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 3, 1994.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge; EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand the case, it is

ORDERED that the joint motion be granted.

The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith a certified copy of this order to the district court in lieu of formal mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowers v. City of High Point
451 S.E.2d 284 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F.3d 1184, 306 U.S. App. D.C. 102, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19379, 1994 WL 179975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-henry-ball-jr-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1994.