Charles F. Noyes Co. v. Hadsell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Charles F. Noyes Co. v. Hadsell

136 S.E.2d 923, 109 Ga. App. 580, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 924

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 8, 1964

Docket40593

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 S.E.2d 923 (Charles F. Noyes Co. v. Hadsell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles F. Noyes Co. v. Hadsell, 136 S.E.2d 923, 109 Ga. App. 580, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 924 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Pannell, Judge.

1. Properly construed, the contract attached to the petition, and upon which the suit was based, is one agreeing to pay plaintiff for services as a real estate broker.

2. The petition, being one to recover for services as a real estate broker, was subject to general demurrer for failure to allege that the plaintiffs were licensed real estate brokers in accordance with the requirements of Code Ann. § 84-1401 and Code § 84-1413. See Mayo v. Lynes, 80 Ga. App. 4 (1, 2) (55 SE2d 174); D. L. Stokes & Co. v. McCoy, 212 Ga. 78 (90 SE2d 404); Cline v. Crane, 90 Ga. App. 192 (82 SE2d 175); Hale v. Chatham, 91 Ga. App. 519 (86 SE2d 536); Brewer-Head Co. v. Jackson, 95 Ga. App. 648 (1), 650 (98 SE2d 167).

3. The trial court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pannell, Judge.

1. Properly construed, the contract attached to the petition, and upon which the suit was based, is one agreeing to pay plaintiff for services as a real estate broker.

2. The petition, being one to recover for services as a real estate broker, was subject to general demurrer for failure to allege that the plaintiffs were licensed real estate brokers in accordance with the requirements of Code Ann. § 84-1401 and Code § 84-1413. See Mayo v. Lynes, 80 Ga. App. 4 (1, 2) (55 SE2d 174); D. L. Stokes & Co. v. McCoy, 212 Ga. 78 (90 SE2d 404); Cline v. Crane, 90 Ga. App. 192 (82 SE2d 175); Hale v. Chatham, 91 Ga. App. 519 (86 SE2d 536); Brewer-Head Co. v. Jackson, 95 Ga. App. 648 (1), 650 (98 SE2d 167).

3. The trial court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Frankum, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.E.2d 923, 109 Ga. App. 580, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-f-noyes-co-v-hadsell-gactapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack