Charles Elvis Raby v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 13, 2009
Docket09-09-00164-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Charles Elvis Raby v. State (Charles Elvis Raby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Elvis Raby v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________



NO. 09-09-00164-CR



CHARLES ELVIS RABY, Appellant



V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 75th District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR24500



MEMORANDUM OPINION


On April 8, 2009, Charles Elvis Raby filed a notice of appeal from an order denying appointment of counsel for DNA testing. The trial court signed an order denying Raby's motion for DNA testing on February 4, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed with the trial court more than thirty days after the date the trial court signed the order denying Raby's motion and outside the time for requesting an extension of time for filing the notice of appeal. We notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. Raby filed a response in which he complained that he did not receive a copy of the order denying his motion for DNA testing until February 25, 2009, twenty-one days after the trial court signed the order.

The time for filing an appeal runs from the denial of the postconviction motion for DNA testing. See Swearingen v. State, 189 S.W.3d 779, 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). No motion for extension of time was timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. It does not appear that the appellant obtained an out-of-time appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Court finds it is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.



STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice



Opinion Delivered May 13, 2009

Do Not Publish



Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swearingen v. State
189 S.W.3d 779 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Charles Elvis Raby v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-elvis-raby-v-state-texapp-2009.