Chapman v. Conner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Chapman v. Conner

226 S.E.2d 625, 138 Ga. App. 518, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2219

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 29, 1976

Docket52111

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 226 S.E.2d 625 (Chapman v. Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chapman v. Conner, 226 S.E.2d 625, 138 Ga. App. 518, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2219 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

1. An appeal with enumerations of error dependent upon a consideration of the evidence heard by the trial court will, absent a transcript, be affirmed. Nicholson v. Nicholson, 231 Ga. 760 (204 SE2d 292); Darsey v. Darsey, 232 Ga. 381 (207 SE2d 22); Jackson v. Jackson, 235 Ga. 656 (221 SE2d 427); Pastis v. Haverty Furniture Cos., 134 Ga. App. 9 (213 SE2d 161) and cits.

2. An amendment to a judgment of the court, sitting without a jury, "adding thereto the following statements, findings of fact and conclusions of law,” while authorized by CPA § 52 (b) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (b)), is not an authorized means of bringing evidence to the appellate court on appeal. Code Ann. § 6-805; Nicholson v. Nicholson, supra.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI