Byrd v. Byrd

274 S.E.2d 167, 156 Ga. App. 655, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 3160
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 6, 1980·No. 60440·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Garnishment. Appellee filed a garnishment against appellant in the State Court of Fulton County. A traverse was filed by appellant and, after evidence being presented, the traverse was denied. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived. No transcript of the evidence was filed with this court. Held:

As the appellant waived the findings of fact and conclusions of law and presents no transcript of the evidence in Fulton State Court, we have no basis on which to conclude the trial court erred in denying her traverse. We presume the trial court’s ruling was authorized by the evidence, and appellant here has shown us no reason that we should not. See Harbin Lumber Co. v. Fowler, 142 Ga. App. 167-168 (235 SE2d 638); Chapman v. Connor, 138 Ga. App. 518 (226 SE2d 625). We therefore affirm the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. Byrd, 274 S.E.2d 167, 156 Ga. App. 655, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 3160 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

274 S.E.2d 167 (Byrd v. Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cox v. City of Lawrenceville
308 S.E.2d 224 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Bray v. Carlyle
306 S.E.2d 89 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Byrd v. Byrd
281 S.E.2d 617 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)