Chapman v. City of Coos Bay Oregon
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
ALISON KATE CHAPMAN, Civ. No. 6:23-cv-907-MK ORDER
Plaintiff, v.
CITY OF COOS BAY, OREGON, et al.,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#94), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, the Court reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). The Court finds no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#94) is adopted. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (#81) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 22nd of October, 2024. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chapman v. City of Coos Bay Oregon (Chapman v. City of Coos Bay Oregon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.