Chapman v. City of Coos Bay Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided September 11, 2024·No. 6:23-cv-00907·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ALLISON KATE CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:23-cv-907-MK v. ORDER

STATE OF OREGON, CITY OF COOS BAY, OREGON, Defendants. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation, (ECF No. 53), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Defendants filed objections. ECF No. 72. Accordingly, the Court reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error and concludes the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 53) is ADOPTED. The State of Oregon’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 47) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against the State of Oregon are DISMISSED, with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 11th day of September, 2024. s/ Michael J. McShane MICHAEL J. MCSHANE United States District Judge 1 –ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. City of Coos Bay Oregon, (D. Or. 2024).

Chapman v. City of Coos Bay Oregon (Chapman v. City of Coos Bay Oregon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related