Chapin-Owen Co. v. Yeoman

233 A.D. 492, 253 N.Y.S. 568, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11341
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 1931·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record does not disclose whether the trial court accepted or rejected defendant’s testimony. If it accepted the testimony, then as matter of law the court erred in its decision. If the court rejected it, error was also done for the testimony was not contradicted or impeached in any respect. It was positive and direct, not incredible on its face and was corroborated. It was, therefore, the duty of the court to give credit to it. (Hull v. Littauer, 162 N. Y. 569; Lomer v. Meeker, 25 id. 361; Powers v. Wilson, 203 App. Div. 232.)

The motion for reargument is denied, with ten dollars costs, and the motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied.

Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapin-Owen Co. v. Yeoman, 233 A.D. 492, 253 N.Y.S. 568, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

233 A.D. 492 (Chapin-Owen Co. v. Yeoman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heissenbuttel v. Comnas
14 Misc. 2d 509 (New York County Courts, 1958)
Melia v. Southern Boulevard Railroad
159 Misc. 293 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1936)
People v. S. W. Straus & Co.
158 Misc. 186 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)
In re the Estate of Carney
150 Misc. 590 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1934)
Locicero v. Messina
239 A.D. 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Schneider v. Swartele
239 A.D. 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)