Chapin Laundry Co. v. Commissioner
This text of 6 B.T.A. 609 (Chapin Laundry Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION.
The evidence consisted of a complete list of the property in question and the statements of three witnesses in the laundry business, two of whom knew the specific property and the third who knew the classes of property, all of whom testified as to the life of each item. From this evidence we find that a reasonable allowance for exhaustion, wear and tear of petitioner’s' laundry machinery, including a reasonable allowance for obsolescence, is 10 per cent.
Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, wnder Rule 50. ■
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 B.T.A. 609, 1927 BTA LEXIS 3456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapin-laundry-co-v-commissioner-bta-1927.