Chapel Hill Cinemas, Inc. v. Robbins

554 S.E.2d 644
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chapel Hill Cinemas, Inc. v. Robbins. Read the opinion of the Court — 354 N.C. 349
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 9, 2001·No. 337A01·Published

Opinion

554 S.E.2d 644 (2001)

CHAPEL HILL CINEMAS, INC., a North Carolina Corporation
v.
Cecil W. ROB BINS and Faye Eloise Robbins.

No. 337A01.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 9, 2001.

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P., by Reid L. Phillips and Jennifer T. Harrod, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellees.

Eisele, Ashburn, Greene & Chapman, P.A., by Douglas G. Eisele, Statesville; and Levine & Stewart, by John T. Stewart, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellants.

*645 PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Tyson.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapel Hill Cinemas, Inc. v. Robbins, 554 S.E.2d 644 (N.C. 2001).

554 S.E.2d 644 (Chapel Hill Cinemas, Inc. v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.