Chapel Hill Cinemas, Inc. v. Robbins
This text of 554 S.E.2d 644 (Chapel Hill Cinemas, Inc. v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CHAPEL HILL CINEMAS, INC., a North Carolina Corporation
v.
Cecil W. ROB BINS and Faye Eloise Robbins.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P., by Reid L. Phillips and Jennifer T. Harrod, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellees.
Eisele, Ashburn, Greene & Chapman, P.A., by Douglas G. Eisele, Statesville; and Levine & Stewart, by John T. Stewart, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellants.
*645 PER CURIAM.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Tyson.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
554 S.E.2d 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapel-hill-cinemas-inc-v-robbins-nc-2001.