Chang v. Goord

808 N.E.2d 854, 1 N.Y.3d 603, 776 N.Y.S.2d 534, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 116
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 12, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 808 N.E.2d 854 (Chang v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chang v. Goord, 808 N.E.2d 854, 1 N.Y.3d 603, 776 N.Y.S.2d 534, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 116 (N.Y. 2004).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum. For the purpose of calculating jail time credit, Penal Law § 70.30 (3) makes no distinction between detention in New York and detention by the federal government or sister states (see Matter of Guido v Goord, 1 NY3d 345 [2004] [decided today]). Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to jail time credit for the period in which he was in federal custody.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur in memorandum; Judge R.S. Smith taking no part.

[605]*605On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bowser
2025 NY Slip Op 01750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
VANVLEET, ALEXANDER S., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Vanvleet
126 A.D.3d 1359 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Criscitello
123 A.D.3d 1235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
PeoplevGiroux
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Zimmerman v. Burge
492 F. Supp. 2d 170 (E.D. New York, 2007)
People v. Howard
15 A.D.3d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Whiting v. State
863 A.2d 1017 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2004)
People v. Norman
6 Misc. 3d 317 (New York Supreme Court, 2004)
People v. Simon
6 A.D.3d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Robinson
5 A.D.3d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Berry
5 A.D.3d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Guido v. Goord
806 N.E.2d 138 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
808 N.E.2d 854, 1 N.Y.3d 603, 776 N.Y.S.2d 534, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chang-v-goord-ny-2004.