Chaney v. Stover

Fourth Circuit

Chaney v. Stover

167 F.2d 471, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3075

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 12, 1948

DocketNo. 5705

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 167 F.2d 471 (Chaney v. Stover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chaney v. Stover, 167 F.2d 471, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3075 (4th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is another appeal in the bankruptcy proceeding which has been before us on two former appeals. See, 4 Cir., 123 F. 2d 945, and, 4 Cir., 158 F.2d 604. The directions contained in our last judgment have been carried out. The property has been reappraised and the bankrupt has been given opportunity to redeem at the appraised valuation, but has failed to do so. There is no merit whatever in the present appeal. The questions raised by it are frivolous and it was manifestly taken for purposes of further delaying and prolonging litigation which has already been protracted beyond all reason. The order appealed from will be affirmed for reasons adequately stated in the opinion of the District Judge; and the mandate of the court will issue forthwith.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is another appeal in the bankruptcy proceeding which has been before us on two former appeals. See, 4 Cir., 123 F. 2d 945, and, 4 Cir., 158 F.2d 604. The directions contained in our last judgment have been carried out. The property has been reappraised and the bankrupt has been given opportunity to redeem at the appraised valuation, but has failed to do so. There is no merit whatever in the present appeal. The questions raised by it are frivolous and it was manifestly taken for purposes of further delaying and prolonging litigation which has already been protracted beyond all reason. The order appealed from will be affirmed for reasons adequately stated in the opinion of the District Judge; and the mandate of the court will issue forthwith.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 F.2d 471, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaney-v-stover-ca4-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack