Chandler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chandler v. State

722 So. 2d 983, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 320, 1999 WL 18416

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1999

DocketNos. 98-3248, 98-3315

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 722 So. 2d 983 (Chandler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chandler v. State, 722 So. 2d 983, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 320, 1999 WL 18416 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR POST-TRIAL RELEASE

PER CURIAM.

Donna R. Chandler filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking review of an order denying her motion for supersedeas bond and stay of sentence pending appeal from her conviction for a second degree misdemeanor. We sua sponte consolidate this case with Chandler’s pending appeal, case no. 98-3315, treat the petition as a motion in that pending appeal, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(g)(4); Wise v. State, 528 So.2d 507, 508 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), aff'd, 537 So.2d 994 (Fla.1989), and grant the motion. The trial court is ordered to grant Appellant’s motion for supersedeas bond and stay of sentence pending appeal.

Appellant is to be released on $3,000 bond (an amount the State conceded would be reasonable) and such other terms and conditions as the trial court deems reasonable.¹ See Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308 (Fla.1956); Baker v. State, 213 So.2d 285 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).

STONE, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR POST-TRIAL RELEASE

PER CURIAM.

Donna R. Chandler filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking review of an order denying her motion for supersedeas bond and stay of sentence pending appeal from her conviction for a second degree misdemeanor. We sua sponte consolidate this case with Chandler’s pending appeal, case no. 98-3315, treat the petition as a motion in that pending appeal, see Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.691(c); Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(g)(4); Wise v. State, 528 So.2d 507, 508 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), aff'd, 537 So.2d 994 (Fla.1989), and grant the motion. The trial court is ordered to grant Appellant’s motion for supersedeas bond and stay of sentence pending appeal.

Appellant is to be released on $3,000 bond (an amount the State conceded would be reasonable) and such other terms and conditions as the trial court deems reasonable.¹ See Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308 (Fla.1956); Baker v. State, 213 So.2d 285 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).

STONE, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 So. 2d 983, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 320, 1999 WL 18416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack