Chandler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chandler v. State

694 So. 2d 845, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6181, 1997 WL 291501

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 4, 1997

DocketNo. 95-01275

StatusPublished

This text of 694 So. 2d 845 (Chandler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chandler v. State, 694 So. 2d 845, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6181, 1997 WL 291501 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant pleaded guilty to several offenses. Appellate counsel has filed an An-ders ¹ brief. Counsel has suggested two possible errors in regard to the appellant’s sentencing. We agree that the trial court erred in assessing the appellant $100 for the Court Improvement Fund. We disapproved that assessment in Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

After careful review of the entire record in this case, we find no other error. Accordingly, we strike the assessment of $100 for the Court Improvement Fund and affirm the appellant’s sentence in all other respects.

Assessment for Court Improvement Fund stricken; otherwise conviction and sentence affirmed.

QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant pleaded guilty to several offenses. Appellate counsel has filed an An-ders ¹ brief. Counsel has suggested two possible errors in regard to the appellant’s sentencing. We agree that the trial court erred in assessing the appellant $100 for the Court Improvement Fund. We disapproved that assessment in Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

After careful review of the entire record in this case, we find no other error. Accordingly, we strike the assessment of $100 for the Court Improvement Fund and affirm the appellant’s sentence in all other respects.

Assessment for Court Improvement Fund stricken; otherwise conviction and sentence affirmed.

QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

694 So. 2d 845, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6181, 1997 WL 291501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack