Chandler v. State
187 So. 247, 28 Ala. App. 461, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 111
Opinion
The defendant was indicted and convicted on a charge of grand larceny, and from, the judgment he appeals.
We have examined, the record in this case. There is no bill of exceptions.
We find no error in the record and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chandler v. State, 187 So. 247, 28 Ala. App. 461, 1939 Ala. App. LEXIS 111 (Ala. Ct. App. 1939).
187 So. 247 (Chandler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weathers v. State
439 So. 2d 1311 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Thomas v. State
363 So. 2d 1020 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)