Chandler v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Chandler v. State

175 So. 326, 27 Ala. App. 491, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 81

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chandler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ala. App. 461 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 1937·No. 8 Div. 396.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

As is required by the statute, we have examined this entire record, and in it we find no questions of merit raised by any of the objections and exceptions to the introduction of evidence.

The evidence was in conflict; that for the state being sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Applying Supreme Court Rule ,45, the judgment in this cáse is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

As is required by the statute, we have examined this entire record, and in it we find no questions of merit raised by any of the objections and exceptions to the introduction of evidence.

The evidence was in conflict; that for the state being sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Applying Supreme Court Rule ,45, the judgment in this cáse is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Chandler v. State, 175 So. 326, 27 Ala. App. 491, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 81 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

175 So. 326 (Chandler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.