Chandler v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Chandler v. State

175 So. 326, 27 Ala. App. 491, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 81

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 8, 1937

Docket8 Div. 396.

StatusPublished

This text of 175 So. 326 (Chandler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chandler v. State, 175 So. 326, 27 Ala. App. 491, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 81 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, Judge.

As is required by the statute, we have examined this entire record, and in it we find no questions of merit raised by any of the objections and exceptions to the introduction of evidence.

The evidence was in conflict; that for the state being sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Applying Supreme Court Rule ,45, the judgment in this cáse is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, Judge.

As is required by the statute, we have examined this entire record, and in it we find no questions of merit raised by any of the objections and exceptions to the introduction of evidence.

The evidence was in conflict; that for the state being sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Applying Supreme Court Rule ,45, the judgment in this cáse is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 So. 326, 27 Ala. App. 491, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-state-alactapp-1937.