Chandler v. Siegelman
248 F.3d 1032, 2001 WL 385378
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 13, 2001
DocketNos. 97-6898, 97-6953
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 248 F.3d 1032 (Chandler v. Siegelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chandler v. Siegelman, 248 F.3d 1032, 2001 WL 385378 (11th Cir. 2001).
Opinions
ORDER:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chandler v. Siegelman
248 F.3d 1032 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 F.3d 1032, 2001 WL 385378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chandler-v-siegelman-ca11-2001.