Chandler v. James

985 F. Supp. 1062, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18998, 1997 WL 736480
District Court, M.D. Alabama·Decided October 29, 1997·No. CV 96-D-169-N·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PERMANENT INJUNCTION

DE MENT, District Judge.

In accordance with the court’s previous opinions, as well as the record as a whole in this cause, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED as follows:

1. The Defendant Governor of Alabama, his successors in office, and all those in active concert and participation with him or her are herewith PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from aiding, abetting, commanding, counseling, inducing, ordering, permitting, procuring, or otherwise enforcing the provisions of Alabama Code Section 16-1-20.3 and any regulations, directives; or policies implementing its provisions.

2. The Attorney General of Alabama, his successors in office, and all those in active concert and participation with him or her, including, but not limited to, all deputy and assistant Attorneys General, are herewith PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from aiding, abetting, commanding, counseling, inducing, ordering, permitting, procuring, or otherwise enforcing the provisions of Alabama Code Section 16-1-20.3 and any regulations, directives, or policies implementing its provisions.

3. The Defendant Alabama State Board of Education, its officers, agents, servants, employees, successors and assigns, and all those in active concert and participation with it are herewith PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from aiding, abetting, commanding, counseling, inducing, ordering, permitting, procuring, or otherwise enforcing the provisions of Alabama Code Section 16-1-20.3 and *1063 any regulations, directives, or policies implementing its provisions.

4. The Defendants, and each of them, Ed Richardson, Bradley Byrne, Stephanie Bell, G.J. “Dutch” Higginbotham, Ethel H. Hall, Willie Paul, David F. Byers, Jr., Sandra Ray, and Mary Jane Caylor, and each of their successors in office, and all those in active concert and participation with each are herewith PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from aiding, abetting, commanding, counseling, inducing, ordering, permitting, procuring, or otherwise enforcing the provisions of Alabama Code Section 16-1-20.3 and any regulations, directives, or policies implementing its provisions.

5. The Defendants, and each of them, DeKalb County Board of Education, Weldon Parrish, Willard A. Israel, Tommie Johnson, Mary Etta Bailey, Johnny Young, and Jimmy Wilbanks, and each of their successors in office, and all those in active concert and participation with each (including, but not limited to, principals, school administrators, staff and teachers employed, assigned, or utilized within the DeKalb County school system) are herewith PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from aiding, abetting, commanding, counseling, inducing, ordering, permitting, procuring, or otherwise enforcing the provisions of Alabama Code Section 16-1-20.3 and any regulations, directives, or policies implementing its provisions.

6. The Defendants, and each of them, DeKalb County Board of Education, Weldon Parrish, Willard A. Israel, Tommie Johnson, Mary Etta Bailey, Johnny Young, and Jimmy Wilbanks, and each of their successors in office, and all those in active concert and participation with each (including, but not limited to, principals, school administrators, staff and teachers employed, assigned, or utilized within the DeKalb County school system) are herewith PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from each and all of the following activities, policies, practices, and conduct:

(a) Regarding Classroom, Activities and Instructional Settings. The Defendants, and each of them, are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from aiding, abetting, commanding, counseling, inducing, ordering, procuring, or permitting school organized or officially sanctioned religious activity in the classrooms of DeKalb County schools including, but not limited to: vocal prayer; Bible and religious devotional or scriptural readings; distribution of religious materials, texts, or announcements; and discussions of a devotional/inspirational nature, regardless of whether the activity is initiated, led by, or engaged in by students.

This PERMANENT INJUNCTION DOES NOT proscribe the educational use of religious texts in the classroom to the extent that material so used is presented in an objective and academic manner, for example, as part of a course of study.

This PERMANENT INJUNCTION DOES NOT proscribe students’ voluntary expression of their own religious beliefs in the form of homework, reports, artwork, or other school assignments as applicable and as academically appropriate.

This PERMANENT INJUNCTION DOES NOT proscribe the display of religious symbols, articles and medals (for example, Crosses and Stars of David) and/or clothing bearing religious messages (provided that the school allows students to display nonreligious expressive symbols and apparel and such display is in accordance with all applicable time, place, and manner restrictions).

This PERMANENT INJUNCTION DOES NOT affect the rights of secondary-school students to engage in religious activity during noninstructional time that is consistent with the federal Equal Access Act, 20 U.S.C. Section 4071 et seq., or to quietly engage in religious activity during noninstructional times, so long as it does not unduly call attention thereto and so long as it does not interfere with the rights of other students to freely pass thereby or to avoid its imposition upon themselves. This PERMANENT INJUNCTION DOES NOT prohibit students from distributing religious materials to classmates during noninstructional time, subject to the same time, place, and manner restrictions imposed on student distributions of nonreligious materials, subject to the provisions of paragraph 6(e) below.

(b) Regarding Graduation or Commencement Exercises. The Defendants, and each *1064 of them, are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from aiding, abetting, commanding, counseling, inducing, ordering, procuring, participating in, or permitting, prayers, invocations, benedictions, or devotional messages at graduation or commencement exercises, regardless of whether such prayer, invocation, benediction, or devotional message is offered by clergy, a student, administrator, teacher, school employee, or nonschool person, regardless of how such prayer, invocation, benediction, or devotional message is denominated, and regardless of whether a public-address system is used. The Defendants, and each of them, are specifically PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from permitting such activity at commencement or graduation exercises in the guise of valedictory, salutatory, historian, or similar student addresses and remarks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chandler v. James, 985 F. Supp. 1062, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18998, 1997 WL 736480 (M.D. Ala. 1997).

985 F. Supp. 1062 (Chandler v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chandler v. Siegelman
248 F.3d 1032 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
Ex parte Moore
773 So. 2d 437 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)
Chandler v. Siegleman
Eleventh Circuit, 1999